Many will share the anger clearly felt by the campaigners, dubbed ‘anti-capitalist protesters’, currently occupying significant spaces in many cities throughout the western world. Many will also share their view that the existing system and the organisations now controlling the economy, are seriously flawed.

However, simply highlighting the shortcomings of the current way of doing things without providing a clear and workable alternative is a lot like ‘kicking the dog’ as a means of venting your frustration when there seems to be no escape from your problems.

Even worse, frustration will only increase when it is discovered that you are kicking a mythical dog, for ‘capitalism’ is a meaningless term. The truth is that, at the root of the unfairness that pervades our economic system are the ultra-selfish individuals who end-up dominating any organisation where adequate oversight has not been applied.

This situation arises irrespective of the basis of the system, it can be found in equal measure within investor-owned companies, in government, and in communist states (past and present). Co-operatives and mutuals are not exempt from this scenario either – think what happened at Northern Rock and in other erstwhile building societies.

The most important discovery that those seeking change can make, is the fact that there actually is a workable alternative, which is co-operation. Of course, its no use pretending that an economic system based upon co-operation will provide a truly significant improvement upon what we have now, that is unless co-operative and mutual enterprises (CMEs) are subject to much more robust systems of democratic control, along with an adequate system of oversight.

So how do we bring about the big changes needed to our economic system and organisations?

First, we need to make sure that the member-controlled enterprise model is properly understood both by all of those involved within all CMEs and by a much wider public.

Secondly, we must come together within a real movement for social change to demand that a set of clear outcomes are adopted, which can strengthen real democracy and put co-operation at the heart of the way in which we organise society. Such a social movement must not be allowed to serve only the interests of those simply wanting to join a political elite, or be hidebound by the dogma of the past. Instead, it must be driven by an unfailing commitment to achieving those changes, that most of us know will have to be made sooner rather than later, if human progress is to continue.

Edgar Parnell writes for the website www.co-oppundit.org

The Occupy London website is at: http://occupylsx.org/

In the context of deficit reduction and austerity politics the boundaries of the state are being re-drawn by the Conservative-led government. Where is the British state going? What will be the impact of these changes on the political choices and strategies ahead of us?

The discussion group Leeds Taking Soundings is hosting a meeting on the state of the state with Michael Kenny, professor of politics at the University of Sheffield. Kenny is a research associate at the Institute of Public Policy Research and Demos think-tanks. He has published widely in the fields of political thought, British politics and public policy. He is currently writing a book on the politics of English nationhood.

His recent article on the big society can be found on the Open Democracy website.

The State of the State
6pm Wednesday 23 February 2011
Old Broadcasting House
Leeds Met University
Leeds

Further details: b.winter@leedsmet.ac.uk

www.takingsoundingsleeds.blogspot.com

The current edition of New Internationalist (NI434. July/August 2010) tackles what I consider  to be one of the most crucial problems we face today, perhaps the most crucial. Headlined ‘Life beyond growth’, it deals with the conundrum that economic growth is not environmentally sustainable and causes a crisis in resources, yet if the economy does not grow, it collapses.

The resources nations depend on, such as oil, are drying up, and extracting such resources is less and less sustainable. This threatens the lifestyles all of us expect to lead. Furthermore, the reckless use of oil and other resourses to feed our lifestyles and habits has brought about a climate crisis which may be irreversable.

The Co-operative group is supporting the Transition movement and the Permaculture movement. I commend this decision because in these grass roots movements can be seen the beginnings of a different way of looking at our lifestyle expectations which take into account the depletion of resources and offer practical, collective ways forward.

The beginnings of the Transition movement are similar, in some respects , to the beginnings of the Co-operative movement, people coming together to address a common need.

Last November Co-operative members sponsored a joint Co-operative/Transition conference in Slaithwaite, West Yorkshire, attracting 200 delegates. There were speakers from both movements who spoke of the need for a co-operative approach to meet the challenge of the oil and climate crisis.

For more information about Co-operative campaigns: www.co-operative.coop/membership

For more about the Transition movement try: www.transitionnetwork.org or http://transitionus.org for a US slant.

For more about teh Permaculture movement: www.permaculture.org.uk

There is an alternative to capitalism, it’s called the co-operative commonwealth. It’s a way of living and trading with business which is run democratically for the benefit of the members and communities who use the services. These businesses are not run for the purpose of making wealthy people richer, as in the capitalist model.

So what is the co-operative commonwealth? And how did it all begin?

It is difficult to imagine what life was like for the textile workers in the early 19^th century. Working conditions were appalling. Wages were poor, women and children were employed as even cheaper labour. Many employers owned the shops and demanded that the workers buy their provisions from these shops or face the sack. In some cases workers received payment in tokens which could only be redeemed at the works shops. Thus the employers profited from their workers twice.

To earn more the shopkeepers adulterated many items. Flour was mixed with broken rice, coffee with chicory, cocoa with brown earth and tea with dried leaves. False weights and measures were used as well – always the poor were the victims.

In Rochdale in 1844 a group of people decided to start a co-operative. It might seem obvious to us now with the benefit of a socialist tradition and clause four of the Labour Party constitution – “by the strength of our common endeavour we achieve more than we achieve alone”. He got a meeting together started to collect funds. Every family had to contribute a certain amount to the initial capital. These families became members and co-owners of the enterprise. They rented some premises in Toad Lane and bought a supply of flour, butter, sugar and oatmeal. The shop was up and running on 21 December 1844.

Principles

Common ownership had been tried before by workers in various places but what is special about the Rochdale Pioneers is that they established certain principles which would guide their enterprise:

1. open and voluntary membership
2. democratic control (one vote per person irrespective of shareholding)
3. fixed and limited interest on share capital
4. return of surplus to members pro rata to their purchases
5. sale of pure and unadulterated goods
6. provision of education (many shops had reading rooms and books were bought for the use of members).

Those principles, modified for today’s world, are still the bedrock of the international co-operative movement and agreed by the ICA (International Co-operative Alliance).

With the success of the Rochdale Co-op, other groups of workers formed co-ops all over the country. So successful were they that the capitalists began to feel threatened. The co-ops were beginning to find that the banks and insurance companies were refusing to do business with them, and wholesalers were trying to squeeze them out of business.

In 1863 the Co-operative Wholesale Society (CWS) was established, followed by the Co-operative Insurance Society (CIS) and the Co-operative Bank. No longer were the co-ops dependent on the whims of private business interests for the provision of wholesale, insurance and banking.

The movement, however, needed to be supported and defended and so the Co-operative Union was founded in 1869 to play a similar role to that performed by the TUC for the trade union movement. Since then it has advised retail societies on financial, legal, labour and taxation matters and provided education and training through the Co-operative College (an integral part of the Co-operative Union). The Co-operative Union organises an annual meeting – Co-operative Congress – at which all co-operative societies affiliated to the Co-operative Union may be represented. In 2003 the Co-operative Union changed its name to Co-operatives UK after including as members non-retailing co-operatives such as credit unions, agricultural, housing, worker and service co-operatives.

The co-operative sector in the UK now contributes an estimated £18 billion to the economy. There are over 1,500 co-operative businesses as well as 400 credit unions and several hundred housing co-operatives.

The Co-op Party

By the time of the First World War it became clear that the movement needed political representation. Legislation was weighted against co-ops and the capitalist institutions were only too eager to put them down.

The Co-operative Party was formed in 1917 as the political arm of the Co-operative Union and is still responsible to the co-operative movement. The founding conference, attended by more than 900 delegates who represented more than 500 co-op societies, was held at Westminster Central Hall. Ten years later the Co-operative Party and the Labour Party signed a formal agreement which enabled local Co-operative parties to affiliate to constituency Labour parties. At elections the two parties work together to return Labour or Labour/Co-operative candidates to the UK parliament, the European parliament or local councils and assemblies. There are currently 29 Labour/Co-operative MPs in the House of Commons, and 14 Labour/Co-operative peers in the House of Lords.

In 1900 there were 1,439 co-operative societies. Today there are 28. Peter Marks, chief executive of United Co-operatives, has spoken of a day when there might be one single co-operative society in Britain. Whether or not that ever happens we have yet to see, but it is true that co-operative societies co-operate with each other. They have formed a trading group which allows them to buy wholesale jointly in order to keep prices down. Through this they share the same logo.

Co-operatives grew from small groups of people meeting a collective need: economic necessity coupled with the values of community. In time, in response to differing pressures, the co-operatives in the retail sector merged and became larger. People working together in this way had created a climate by which they could fulfil their educational, social and economic needs.

I still have my grandparents’ share book. They joined Brightside and Carbrook Co-operative Society (later Sheffield Co-operative Society) in 1922. My grandfather was a manual worker at Tinsley Park Coke Ovens and they lived through some rough times, especially 1926. The twice yearly ‘divi’ really meant something and at times they would not have been able to manage without it. At other times they did not draw it out and left it there for a rainy day. The last entry in the share book is 1971. As a child I remember quoting my grandmother’s divi number when I ran an errand.

The most outstanding thing about co-operation is its ability to adapt, to fulfil all kinds of common need. Who would have thought that today we’d have a phone co-op, credit unions, opticians, wind turbine co-ops, housing co-ops, football supporters’ trusts, care co-ops, a sustainable bio-fuel filling station co-op, and Greenwich Council’s leisure services run as a co-op. The list grows because, as needs arise, the co-operative model can be adapted to meet them. We are approaching a time when all our goods and services can be supplied by co-ops. We will indeed be living in the co-operative commonwealth. We are talking here about common ownership, job creation, democratic control and community building.

What the Labour Party lost when it abandoned its old clause 4, the Co-operative Party can put back through co-operative common ownership. All this is anathema to the Tories. They despise it. The co-operative movement suffered badly during 18 hostile years of Tory government when a culture of demutualisation began. At one point the existence of the CWS, the pillar of British co-operation, was threatened by the Regan debacle, or Lancia affair.

Since Labour came to power in 1997 the co-operative movement has received a good deal of support in the Commons, mainly through private members’ bills supported by the government and the Co-operative Party, and some good pieces of legislation have been enacted to support and strengthen the movement. These include the Industrial & Provident Societies Act, the Employee Share Scheme Act, and the Community Interest Companies Act.

We should be aware of the advantages the movement has gained over the last few years. And what we stand to lose if the Tories get in again, with their recipe of monocultural capitalism. We should be aware of the common ownership models which are coming into being such as Community Development Trusts and Community Forums like the Sharrow Forum. Help and advice is always available through Co-operatives UK and at a local level the Sheffield Co-operative Development Group at Aizelwood’s Mill which supports workers’ co-ops.

Workers co-ops are represented by ICOM (Industrial Common Ownership Movement) which is now incorporated into Co-operatives UK. We have many of them in Sheffield.

Culture and ethos

The co-operative movement is not only a collection of businesses, it is a culture, an ethos, which carries the seeds of radicalism. This is the same radicalism which transformed the social horrors of the industrial revolution to the relative comfort of the 20^th century. It is also the radicalism that seeks to deliver us from the market fundamentalism of Thatcherism. It is a firm and integral part of the Labour movement and has been since its earliest days.

The co-operative movement is internationalist and is not content to rest upon its past achievements of delivering good, honest, fairly traded food to its members and customers. That battle is largely won. It is in the international context that the work must go on. That is why the co-operative movement has been a leading player in making the Fairtrade Mark products mainstream in supermarkets. The co-op has led by example, being a member of the ‘Ethical Trading Initiative’ and converting all its own label coffee and block chocolate to fairtrade.

The Co-operative Group have made it a priority to source their own label products ethically. ‘Ethical trade directs its efforts at improving basic human rights and safe workplace standards for employees of supplying producers and manufacturers.’ These standards are verified by continual monitoring which includes visits from representatives of the co-operative movement. Other co-op labelled products carry the Fairtrade mark. This guarantees the producers a fair price for their produce.

Being membership-based organisations which recognise the cultural and educational dimension, co-ops organise events all over the country to help foster an understanding of these international issues. They play a major role in campaigns such as Fairtrade Week, Make Your Town Fairtrade and Make Your School Fairtrade.

It is not only trading issues which concern the movement but the whole environmental spectrum which affects us all. For example, meetings have been organised throughout the country to help members and the public at large understand the implications of climate change. These events have been organised by the Co-operative Group with the help of organisations such as Friends of the Earth, Climate Care, Moorcar Co-operative, the Woodland Trust, Traid and Oxfam.

The co-operative movement is going through a big change at the moment, after a period when large sections of it became dispirited and moribund. In the Co-operative Group, for example, real dividends have been restored, providing twice yearly payments to members based on their trade with co-op group businesses in areas such as banking, insurance, funerals, pharmacy, food and travel. Members also get a preferential rate of interest on their savings with the Co-op Society.

In the last four years the co-operative movement has become stronger and more focussed on its values. There are now 20 consumer owned co-operatives in the UK including the Phone Co-op. Sheffield Co-op, Leeds Co-op, United Co-ops, and Lothian and Borders Co-op are all now part of the Co-operative Group, while Plymouth and South West soon will be. Furthermore, the Co-operative Group has bought Somerfield.

After further legislation which allows different types of mutual and co-operative organisations to merge, Co-operative Financial Services (The Co-operative Bank, CIS, and Smile) have merged with Britannia Building Society.

All of this has necessitated a constitutional review to renew the membership structure and area and regional boundaries, and to accommodate the enlarged Society.

The Co-operative Review of 2009 includes some impressive figures for the Movement. ‘Over 4820 jointly-owned, democratically controlled, enterprising businesses, owned by more than 11.3 million people, 1 in 5 of the British population, creating and sustaining more than 205,800 jobs, contributing £28.9 billion in turnover and £9.7 billion in assets to the UK economy, building wealth for the many not the few.’

The Co-operative Group has Values and Principles committees which guide the society to fulfil the co-op values and principles in the best way possible. Yet, as with any democratic membership organisation, it functions best with a large, active and well-informed membership.

Of course, co-operative societies would not be able to function if they failed to make a profit or surplus. The co-operative in the market place is pitched against some of the most ruthless players in the commercial world. The Co-operative Group’s re-branding exercise will emphasise to the shopping public the unique nature of a co-operative. With a renewed membership, and societies merging into a more cohesive movement, this is a decisive moment in the co-operative renaissance.

Read more about Co-operatives UK and the Co-operative Values and Principles here.
Find out about the Co-operative Party, and Co-operative Party MPs, here.
For the latest news of the co-operative movement, read Co-operative News.