My Long Road to Labour

We’re often told that radical young people are turned off by mainstream parties and parliamentary politics. Not 17-year-old LIAM COOK. Here, he describes his own political journey – from anarchy and apathy to Labour (and the ILP).

Being born in 1996 offers me a very strange outlook on British politics. I can remember, clearly, my father’s post-Thatcher enthusiasm drain as our ‘Dear Leader’ Tony Blair systematically destroyed the party he’d spent so long hoping would succeed.Labour rose

I watched the crosses move from the rose to the birdy-orange-one as Charles Kennedy fought the good, weak social democratic fight and then, reluctantly, back to the red box as he inevitably failed, next to the names that had been run through the dirt for the past 10 years.

By the time I was politically active, I had nothing to support. In times gone by, my 15th birthday would have come with a Labour Party membership slip and a self-addressed envelope. Instead, it came with news of the slow privatisation of the NHS, an NHS I was going to be relying on more and more as conditions progressed, and a feeling of powerlessness to stop it.

At 16, I attended a meeting of the Socialist Party, to no avail. There were more beards than workable alternatives, more leaflets than ideals. Then I met with the Anarchist Party of Huddersfield (as idealistic and functionally ineffective as it sounds).

On a particularly drizzly and depressing Huddersfield afternoon, I popped into the local Labour Party offices. The sad looking bespectacled man behind the desk handed me, with great reluctance, a few forms and leaflets before adding, “I wouldn’t though, mate. They’re all useless around here.” (In fact, “useless” is a more polite term for what he actually said.)

So, at 17, I was clueless. My schoolbag was bereft of badges adorned with witty slogans and cute graphics. The only political iconography to be found was on the clueless punks or thoughtless tankies, seemingly held together by their collective ignorance.

Beyond apathy

Antonio Gramsci wrote that the biggest tool of capitalism was apathy. If people are apathetic, they allow the oppression to continue; it’s better the devil you know than the alternative you don’t. He also said that the biggest issue for the left was apoliticism, which the left itself seems to further via its view that a select minority of intellectuals, and only they, can create change. Reading Gramsci began to reverse my own rampant apathy and apoliticism.Bradford ILP mural.jpg

But it was Miliband who put the fire back in my desire to be part of the Labour movement – and I don’t mean Ed. I found Ralph Miliband’s Parliamentary Socialism and Socialism for a Sceptical Age in the library next to the already well-thumbed Tony Benn titles, and from it I gleaned a sense of how the parliamentary system could be used for one’s advantage. Radicalism could come from the seats of parliament far more effectively than from academics in pub conference rooms.

It was the vote against intervention in Syria that solidified my views. The millions who marched against war had won their first victory – but only with the help of the hundreds who represented them.

The Labour Party was still a bitter pill to swallow. Miliband the Younger made no effort to say he will reverse the cuts put in place by the incumbent government. It still felt hopeless just to sit with the men in tweed jackets and shout, with little being accomplished.

On a whim, I looked to see whether the Independent Labour Party was still around. I remembered from GCSE history that the ILP was quite influential on my political beliefs, and was reminded of them by the mural in Bradford (above) which greeted me on my daily bus ride to college. I learned that not only did they exist, but they were just around the corner. It was a no-brainer to take a look at their current form.

It was a breath of fresh air to see a Labour-aligned pressure group that came so close to my own views on radical socialism within a parliamentary system, and also aimed to be proactive in getting things done. It seemed to combine intellectual debate and academia with support for direct action by groups such as the People’s Assembly, while also retaining a knowledge of the second step of direct action – the part where the point gets actioned by those in power. You may have a good idea, but unless you work at it, that good idea will stay an idea for ever.

This, happily, is where my current story ends: what can be done is yet to be seen. All I can say is that I am incredibly hopeful about where I happened to end up, and cannot wait to stop searching and start doing. Maybe the future can be better than Orwell’s vision of a boot stamping on a man’s face, or at least we can help to make it slightly more padded.


Liam Cook is studying philosophy, history and physics at York College. You can follow him on twitter @liamistrying.


  1. Alan Brooke
    10 April 2014

    I have lived and been active in Huddersfield all my life. I have never heard of any such entity as the ‘Anarchist Party of Huddersfield’. Anarchists would never refer to themselves as a ‘Party’. This falsehood makes me sceptical of the rest of the account.
    Unless the writer means he had been to an Anarchist Party, in which case he probably became too drunk to remember anyhting after that…

  2. Harry Barnes
    14 February 2014

    Liam : Agewise, you made it into the Labour Party four years before I did. I joined as a Bevanite in the days of the truimph of Gaitskellism and have remained an activist and a critic almost ever since. Hence my initial move into the ILP in the mid 1970s when it ended its 40 years plus of running as a separate political party. It will be interesting to see how you react to the next 60 years, when you will have reached my current age. I also studied philosophy (with politics) at Hull University, as an adult student from 1962 to 1965. The Philosophy Department was dominated by language analysis, originating especially from the approach of Wittgenstein. Whilst it was correct to stress that clartity in thinking is important, the Wittgenstein approach did not appreciate that clarity by itself is not enough. I suspect that philosophy has moved on a great deal since thoses days. So has the Labour Party. Harold Wilson became leader just a few months after I arrived in Hull.

    I am interested in a current key political problem. How to attract many more young people into electoral engagement and into labourite and democratic socialist activity. Perhaps our paths will cross to discuss this sometime.

    On your views on academics and MPs – I suppose that I was a bit of both. I taught at Sheffield University for 21 years, then was as an MP for 18 years. Yet I found the former to be much more satisfactory than the later. But I did have the luck of teaching mainly with classes of Trade Unionist via the Extramural Department. We had far more in-depth political discussions than was the norm in parliament – where it tended to be yah-boo politics. What I disliked about university life was its internal form of politicking as part of careerism. Parliament was the same, but was somerthing I anticipated. However, I was ready for the move to parliament and soon afterwards, Thatcherites helped to destroy the very industrial day release teaching which I found to be so important. All I could do was complain to Tory Ministers.

    I hope that our paths cross at ILP events.

  3. TimP
    31 January 2014

    Good for you.

Comments are closed.